Time to Start Thinking of Hogan’s Replacement
(This article originally appeared in www.thejournal.ie on the15th May 2018)
Next year sees the
end of the current five year European political cycle and the beginning of the
next one. Apart from the election of 750 Members of the European Parliament, we
will also see the replacement of the 28 European Commissioners, who serve in
the Cabinet of President Jean-Claude Junker.
Junker's position is also up for grabs, having announced that he will step down next year. As happened in 2014 the next President will be chosen from the European political group which has the most Members elected to the European Parliament. This Spitzenkandidat process was introduced as part of the Lisbon Treaty, and represents an attempt by the European institutions to provide more direct democracy to the Brussels system. Prior to this process the President was chosen by the Leaders of the Members States. Now their role is reduced, with the intention being that they rubber-stamp the candidate that is put forward by the Parliament.
One of the first tasks of the new President will be to choose their Cabinet. They must do this from the pool of Commissioners nominated by each Member State, putting the candidates into the portfolio most suited to their talents. In recent times, there has been more pressure on them to defend the individual Commissioners and the make-up of their Cabinet. Public scrutiny is likely to increase next time round. One result will be that the current gender imbalance of two male Commissioners for every female Commissioner is unlikely to continue.
In all there are 28 Commissioners, one from each Member State. The role and position given to each Commissioner is linked to their experience and gravitas. The calibre, experience and ability of Ireland’s choice of Commissioner will be of huge importance. It’s even more significant post-Brexit, when we will lose the UK, historically one of our key allies, from the meeting tables of Brussels.
Junker's position is also up for grabs, having announced that he will step down next year. As happened in 2014 the next President will be chosen from the European political group which has the most Members elected to the European Parliament. This Spitzenkandidat process was introduced as part of the Lisbon Treaty, and represents an attempt by the European institutions to provide more direct democracy to the Brussels system. Prior to this process the President was chosen by the Leaders of the Members States. Now their role is reduced, with the intention being that they rubber-stamp the candidate that is put forward by the Parliament.
One of the first tasks of the new President will be to choose their Cabinet. They must do this from the pool of Commissioners nominated by each Member State, putting the candidates into the portfolio most suited to their talents. In recent times, there has been more pressure on them to defend the individual Commissioners and the make-up of their Cabinet. Public scrutiny is likely to increase next time round. One result will be that the current gender imbalance of two male Commissioners for every female Commissioner is unlikely to continue.
In all there are 28 Commissioners, one from each Member State. The role and position given to each Commissioner is linked to their experience and gravitas. The calibre, experience and ability of Ireland’s choice of Commissioner will be of huge importance. It’s even more significant post-Brexit, when we will lose the UK, historically one of our key allies, from the meeting tables of Brussels.
In the past the position
of Ireland’s Commissioner has often been given as a reward to an ally, or as a
way to get a troublesome prince out of the realm. Other countries adopt a
different attitude and send their elite. A third of the current crop of Commissioners
are either ex-Prime Minsters or ex-Deputy Prime Ministers.
We need to consider what type of Commissioner is best suited to meet our needs for
the coming five year term of office. Some small countries show the way in how
to gain clout from choosing well. Luxembourg’s past Commissioners include
Gaston Thorn, Jacques Santer and Jean-Claude Junker. Like them, we must be
strategic in how we choose the nominee, and while respecting that it’s
ultimately the choice of the new President, we should choose them with an eye
on which portfolio they should aim for. Portfolios of taxation, or budget, or
regional development can have a significant impact on Ireland’s economic
future.
I believe that the
European Union Affairs Committee is the ideal channel to start an examination
process. As a former Chair of the Committee I know that the Members have a
significant grasp of the issues that matter, and could be expected to identify
the likely skill-set for our next nomination. Our MEPs are also entitled to attend
and often do. The Committee would be
likely to consider issues such as forthcoming legislation, for instance on a
common tax, or development in the governance of the eurozone, or changes to
cohesion funding requirement, all of which could impact on a peripheral Member State
at the edge of the union.
The outcome of their
work would be a job specification for what the next nominee needs, which would
then allow the Oireachtas to consider a range of names for the post. The nature
of the role dictates that we should consider people who have worked at the
highest political levels. Apart from the UK Commissioner, ex-Ambassador to
Ireland Julian King, every other current Commissioner has run for public
office.
We have a number of
heavyweights such as Eamon Gilmore and Enda Kenny who possess much of the
required skill-set. At this stage we don’t need to be prescriptive. We need to
instigate a process to identify the type of person we need as our next
Commissioner. The output of that will give us a clearer picture of who should
step in to Phil Hogan’s shoes in 2019.
Comments
Post a Comment